Quantum bodies have certain characteristics. Pinning those characteristics down to a series of constants and constraints proves impossible to do without the addition of Normality. In physics, the renormalisation process takes place largely to get rid of infinity, a particular problem harboured by the Universe in which all sorts of things from atoms to neutrinos can become neatly entangled.
One of the effects which quanta have to negotiate is the condition known as entropy. In all the various guises in which it appears, entropy can be said to be the arrow on which our concept of time is hinged. Entropy dictates the state of a material degrading into something else, as cowpats become slurry and hot coffees become cool. There is only one direction entropy can take, cold coffees refusing to become hot again and cowpats being unable to return to their former singular (if rather sloppy) state. Time moves forward into the future and entropy chunters along with it.

In the blackbody problem, tackled by physicists in the early 1900s, it was found that the second law of thermodynamics (the transference of heat energy into a dissipative state) went through many permutations as a body, a hot iron poker in the original thinking, was heated and then left to cool as entropy took over. Heated up to the blue-white glow you can't safely look at, at ridiculous temperatures, emissions in the ultraviolet spectrum were found, while at a cooler state when the red glow wore off, emissions in the infra-red range became apparent. Photons, it was deduced, are not confined to visible light but can exist at other levels beyond sensory perception. So the nature of quanta brought itself to the fore, refusing to be constricted to the most basic of experimental observation. Soon scientists would find that the very act of observation itself will affect the outcome of quantum processing.

Our lifetimes in this dimension equate to around 29,200 days, assuming an 80 year span. That's 29,200 opportunities to oscillate, most of which we readily accept. We wake up to a certain day feeling a certain way and that's the day generally forecast, not much you can do about it. Strength of will pervades to bring the balances to rights on a general level, and mini-oscillations to switch mood can easily take place, but up days and down days are a feature of living to the human race. Perhaps all other races are the same.
80 years isn't long to a Sun. In fact if the Sun were to be renormalised into human years it would be 62 million, 500 thousand years old by now, divide that by 80 and you get 781,250 Sun-years for every one of ours. A Sun year divided into 365 days gives you
 2140.4109589

which is probably significant to someone somewhere, but not me. Enough playing with the online calculator, thanks.
Time and light - photons and entropy - have a powerful place in our daily existence. The more we understand the truth behind 'every day is a new dawn' and the opportunities to oscillate which we don't always appreciate (for better or worse), the easier life seems to be, for it is within our power, if not our nature, to let go of reins now and then and let the Universe have a chance to sow some seeds of its own. We have bright days, and dark days. We're never out of the equation, we form a molecule of mankind, and what we do with our minds is far more important in the great pool of evolutionary schematics than what we do with our bodies.
We are quanta, we are small, and when physicists get a head-wrap around the fact that they are what they seek to understand, we'll have a supernova target-race towards a Theory of Everything that actually means something to everybody. 

Straight to the point - what is love? Silly question? I don't think so. The one force that drives everything living to do what it does can't be a force to be reckoned with lightly. I take it here that love and fear are polar opposites, thus part and parcel of the same thing, one built on preservation and the other on procreation.

Particles have relationships. The science tells us that - arguing with the science in this respect is like saying dolphins aren't sentient. Once upon a time we might have been forgiven for thinking so, but not any more. We've evolved our conscious commodity to the extent that we know things now we'd not have thought possible a couple of centuries ago. Our lifetimes are nanoseconds on the cosmic scale and there's an awful lot of learning to pack in there, if we want to achieve something with 'Humanity' that might actually be worth achieving.

Let's just say for argument's sake that love works somewhere in the electromagnetic field. After all, it's this field which defines life to be living, and we know it has a spectrum of workable parts. Infra red keeps things warm, ultra violet keeps things clean. In simple terms, we know quite a lot already, but there are huge missing links in our information cache, so scientists struggle to constrain everything they find into boxes which have existed in the human mind for 100 years. These boxes need expanding and we have an awful lot of alum keys, I'm sure, right under our noses.

Build the quantum laws into the EM spectrum, and the picture might look a little different. The EM spectrum looks like a straight line moving from one identified waveform to the next. Bear in mind that visible light only forms a tiny section of that spectrum, and that new treatments using laser light have unearthed dozens of new sub-sections in the infra red band alone! Could we perhaps consider some variants on the theme, taking into account the unnerving propensity for oscillation, and the abstract nuance of non-locality, together with the tangled hierarchy which really can't be ignored on the human level? 

In the search for energy, force, materials and matrixes, could there be another key in the way we are with each other?