While hot on the trail of Woo, as defined by the scientific community and demonstrated here in the vociferousness of all its glory, and here - and here - _ - .... I discovered the merit in their argument. That Woo is undefinable, improbable and certainly un-prove-able (some might say) Tosh that has no bearing at all on anything relevant.

One of the most vociferous of these exponents of Positivism has challenged me several times to define the reasoning behind the preposterous idea that the human (organic) body has an EM field. He hinges a lot of store by this.

Strange expressed an unmitigated level of gratitude for my revelation (in his world) that the EM field and electromagnetism were proven, mathematically, to be one and the same. His response was pertinent, for this revelation (in my world) had shaken me up quite a bit, and come along at a time when that information (in hindsight) was of critical importance.     

I'm not the only one for whom it's important. For hot on the trail of 5D are those exponents of what is commonly coined Love, a somewhat disgusting and at the very least distasteful item to be mentioned in any self-respecting context of public domain, at least as far as business puritans and positivists are concerned. To scientists, it's Woo.
Love is dead. Long live the proven theory.


​Beauty and Truth remain in the firing line.

Call me crazy, but if electromagnetism and 5D have the same vibrational signature as deduced by the maths, then it sort of stands to reason that our electrons are 'hard-wired' for some kind of interdimensional access system. 

I don't know where this is going, really. But short of dying, which is occasionally a not-unattractive option, gotta sit it out. So that's what I'll do, for as long as it takes me.

Three dimensions of space and one of time - four in all leaving room for a fifth to be another version of reality we've yet to understand.
Humankind, however, has been hot on its trail for a while now (this 2006 article from NBC News mentions the LHC in futuristic terms) baying for the scent of something meaningful like the eager pack of explorers we truly are. While the scientists search on for Dark Matter and conjure dimensional sequences to fit the parameters, the rest of us are relying on our relationships to tell us where to go next.
Science is fond of constants - they don't need renormalising. And there's always a constraint to consider, examples of which Wikipedia provides, whether anyone likes it or not. What Wiki has to say about the Schroedinger equation shouldn't go unnoticed either, as it covers a lot of ground including the Multiversal kind, and makes application of the quantum field more accessible to the macroscopic.
​
With time as a constant in terms of our spacetime and various constraints to choose from, 5th dimensional access appears a little obscure. While the LHC (see the first link) was hailed as possibly producing the first solid evidence for extra-dimensional shift, things have been (publically, anyway) a little quiet on that front so far. Dark Matter and 5th dimension have a relationship, it needs to be said, and was indeed said to the left in 2013, before most of us were aware of any such thing being of any special significance at all. However, things come along in precession of each other, and Life has a funny way of demonstrating its relevance after the event. Here we are, four years later, and suddenly social trending tells us that 5th dimensional access is here to stay (just check your search engine!), in tandem with the world of normality we've been taught to live in without questioning it too deeply. 

Movement in time and movement of light are related; time travel (as a result) is a possibility dependent on the speed of light (the preceding link was also put out there in 2013). So given all we have to go on in moving through this world are the reflective qualities of photons to light our way, we have to accept that the 3D effect we live with is governed, somehow, by our relationship with photons. Photons know how to slip the dimensional leash. As the purveyors of electromagnetic force, they are universally important, and as with neutrinos, we don't really know much about them at all.


​More recently (this year), a team in Montreal have found that the photon can encode information in 10 dimensions, which is quite a span of action. Talk (in that article) of using entangled photons to make light work of many ranges just goes to show how valuable entangled relationships are. 
Thinking of dimensions as layers separated by membranes, it shouldn't be hard for us to escape the rigid impression of solidity we've been brought up to rely on. Mind, you might agree, doesn't reside in the brain, so Mind is surely already there. When we can take a step back from 3D reality to appreciate we're only observing it (in other words, making way for the collapse of the wave packet), isn't this enough to free a lot of constraints in our thinking? The effects, if so, may prove to be ambrosia, for the multitude of us waiting at the bridge can't all be wrong... Quantumology.org