A heavy quark partnership is a rare thing, hardly ever seen even at the LHC. A pentaquark was found at CERN in the LHCb experiment, binding the Beauty quark to four others. Pentaquarks are (probably) found outside earthbound laboratories in supernovas. They're rare, as supernovae are rare, and they're very short-lived by any particle standards. The fifth quark is an Antiquark according to the link above, but there is also reference to a Lambda baryon, where the strange and charm are found. Can we surmise that perhaps not as much is known about the Pentaquark as some would like us to believe?
If correspondence between particle behaviour and human behaviour is anything to go by (click out right now if you think this is Woo) we might be on the verge of creating a Penta-paradigm from heavy elements of human development. There are high-energy non-local relationships in existence right now that seem to be sweeping the world - tens of thousands are flocking to social media for answers and many tens of thousands more who don't go there must also be caught up in the wave. This paradigm finds lots of labels to attach itself to in the rush.
Labels aside, the system of our entangled attachments could be said to form a model something like the image here which is a mathematical shape, a Rhombus, its origin linked behind the picture - you'll have to eat cookies from Cool Math to read more about it.
Labels aside, the system of our entangled attachments could be said to form a model something like the image here which is a mathematical shape, a Rhombus, its origin linked behind the picture - you'll have to eat cookies from Cool Math to read more about it.
A primary difficulty for the people involved in any relationship is emotion. The handling of emotion is juxtaposed for males and females, who process and perceive emotion in entirely different ways. They think differently, and that's the butt of a lot of jokes.
Males prefer to quell emotion with logic before the emotion takes a hold, while females allow emotion to take hold and (eventually) come round to logic. In yin-yang terms, this follows the concept through a number of polarities.
Were we to introduce emotion and logic here, we'd have another polarisation - the principle of the yin-yang system is balance and we have to have some room for manoeuvre in moving towards equilibrium, in order to utilise its application.
Males prefer to quell emotion with logic before the emotion takes a hold, while females allow emotion to take hold and (eventually) come round to logic. In yin-yang terms, this follows the concept through a number of polarities.
Were we to introduce emotion and logic here, we'd have another polarisation - the principle of the yin-yang system is balance and we have to have some room for manoeuvre in moving towards equilibrium, in order to utilise its application.
Logic in relation to maths is an ordered system with rules. As such, its application is affiliated, or bound by constraints which lead to unarguable conclusions. Emotion, on the other hand, is a free radical, with no affiliation other than to the object of attachment at the time, which can be anything. There are no rules, and by default no affiliation. When two elements meet, one must win, and for the male, it is more important to think straight and have a clear head than it is to feel things. For a female, 'feeling things' is the driving force of her decision-making process, perhaps interpreted/misinterpreted as a 'soft option' which can hold her back in executive-boardroom stakes. Hence the disproportionate number of males in executive boardrooms.
"You can't pick 'em apart. They don't come apart," seemed worth quoting from a family discussion, for such is the definition of a Quark, held together as it is by Gluons, and we're made of these things. Other than in the LHC, and possibly in supernovas, you won't find a Quark on its own. We are only here, in cosmic terms, for a very short space of time, so if we're going to know what to do with ourselves when the need to feel and think (at the same time) kicks in, maybe the template is right here and now....is there a fifth element?
A friend sent me this video, less than ten minutes of time devoted to real-time evidence of emotion at work in the quantum field. Gregg Braden lays out the roadmap of what we can do with thought. It's a starter for ten... youtu.be/PZpRP1FV0lE
"You can't pick 'em apart. They don't come apart," seemed worth quoting from a family discussion, for such is the definition of a Quark, held together as it is by Gluons, and we're made of these things. Other than in the LHC, and possibly in supernovas, you won't find a Quark on its own. We are only here, in cosmic terms, for a very short space of time, so if we're going to know what to do with ourselves when the need to feel and think (at the same time) kicks in, maybe the template is right here and now....is there a fifth element?
A friend sent me this video, less than ten minutes of time devoted to real-time evidence of emotion at work in the quantum field. Gregg Braden lays out the roadmap of what we can do with thought. It's a starter for ten... youtu.be/PZpRP1FV0lE
RSS Feed
